Close this search box.
The "Fake Electors" Saga: Probes Spanning Multiple U.S. States

The aftermath of the 2020 U.S. presidential election was a maelstrom of turmoil and legal wrangling, as former President Donald Trump and his cohorts launched an unprecedented campaign to contest the results. Amidst the post-election chaos, one striking phenomenon emerged – the rise of “fake electors.” These individuals boldly submitted counterfeit Electoral College votes, falsely asserting that Trump had triumphed in states where President Joe Biden had clearly clinched victory. These actions have not faded into obscurity, with investigations now unfolding across various states to hold those involved accountable.

The Rise of Fake Electors

The “fake electors” saga unfolded as Republican officials, including lawmakers, activists, and GOP representatives, convened in pivotal battleground states. These states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, were all carried by Joe Biden. In the aftermath of the 2020 election, these officials convened meetings in December 2020 and endorsed “alternate” elector slates, confidently asserting Trump’s triumph in their respective states. These contrived certificates were then forwarded to Congress and the National Archives, even though they never factored into the final vote tally.

Orchestrated Efforts

  • The creation and submission of these spurious elector slates were orchestrated by the Trump campaign and prominent legal figures such as Rudy Giuliani.
  • The scheme’s public exposure at the time immediately ignited legal questions.
  • Subsequently, false electors in Michigan and Georgia were indicted on charges including conspiracy, forgery, impersonation of public officers, and fabricating false statements and documents.

Georgia’s Legal Maneuvers: The Fulton County Indictments

Georgia witnessed a significant legal development when Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis issued indictments against 19 defendants, collectively facing 41 charges. These charges were closely tied to Trump and his allies’ endeavors to overturn the 2020 election. Notable among the defendants were Trump himself and attorney Rudy Giuliani, along with several individuals deeply implicated in the planning and execution of the “fake electors” operation within the state. Intriguingly, four defendants have since struck plea deals. These include attorney Kenneth Chesebro, a central figure in orchestrating the false electors scheme. Others who impersonated false electors secured immunity deals even before formal charges were filed.

READ MORE  Jeff Bezos: Mastermind of Amazon and Pioneer of Digital Innovation

Michigan’s Legal Battle: Felony Charges Unleashed

In Michigan, another hotbed of election-related turmoil, 16 GOP officials who had masqueraded as fake electors after the 2020 election found themselves facing felony charges. These charges were initiated in July, underscoring the seriousness of the legal response to the false electors’ actions. However, it’s noteworthy that one of the defendants had their charges dropped in October following a “cooperation deal” with prosecutors.

Arizona’s Ongoing Investigation: Democratic Scrutiny

Arizona’s Democratic State Attorney General Kris Mayes embarked on an investigation into the attempts to overturn the 2020 election and the “fake electors” scheme. Though this probe was reported to be gaining momentum in July, it remains in its nascent stages. It remains unclear whether this investigation will expand to encompass other post-election activities beyond the realm of false electors.

Nevada’s Subdued Inquiry: Silent Examination

In Nevada, Democratic State Attorney General Aaron Ford was quietly scrutinizing officials involved in submitting a counterfeit slate of electors. While this investigation surfaced in November, it was surprising considering the attorney general’s prior testimony, where he expressed doubts about the applicability of state statutes to address the misconduct of the electors. Recent reports suggest that the Nevada probe might potentially extend beyond the actions limited to that state.

New Mexico’s Probe: Investigating Under State Law

New Mexico’s Democratic Attorney General Raúl Torrez is actively engaged in investigating the “fake electors” scheme, affirming earlier reports from local sources. The attorney general has been methodically “investigating the allegations under state law.” This move followed New Mexico’s initial redirection of inquiries about its fake electors to federal prosecutors.

READ MORE  Nita Marie: Influence and Identity in the Digital Realm

Federal Charges: Trump’s Legal Dilemmas

In addition to the state-level investigations, former President Donald Trump found himself indicted in federal court. These federal charges encompassed his endeavors, along with those of his allies, to overturn the 2020 election, including their involvement in the “fake elector” scheme. However, as of now, no charges have been brought against anyone else in this specific federal case.

Legal Complexity and Ambiguity

While charges have been filed in certain states, the path forward remains shrouded in uncertainty. Legal proceedings are actively unfolding in Georgia and Michigan. Electors who still face pending charges have steadfastly pleaded not guilty. In Michigan, concerns arose when Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel suggested that some electors may have been “brainwashed.” This raised questions about the prosecution’s underlying theory.

The New Mexico Enigma

The “fake electors” under investigation in New Mexico encounter distinct challenges regarding potential charges. Unlike other states where alternate electors falsely claimed to be the “duly elected” representatives, New Mexico’s certificates adopted a more cautious approach. They explicitly stated their status as an alternate slate of electors, just in case Biden’s victory was invalidated. This nuance could complicate potential prosecution in the state.

Final thoughts

The drama surrounding the “fake electors” continues to play out across multiple U.S. states. It underscores the legal ramifications that some individuals may face for their roles in attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. While select cases have advanced to the stage of charges and indictments, the legal terrain remains complex and uncertain, promising further developments in this unfolding saga.

READ MORE  Simon Jordan's Business Ventures, Personal Life, Net Worth, and Management in Football